Fatal Bicycle Accident Involving Amerifreight Truck
The Ernst Law Group is investigating a fatal bicycle accident including an Amerifreight truck and a bicyclist that occurred at 7:20 am on June 25, 2021 in San Luis Obispo, California.
The collision occurred between Suburban Road and Higuera Street. The bicycle was trapped under the semi-truck resulting in the bicyclist’s death.
The cause of the collision, at this point, is unknown. But The Ernst Law Group has been filing lawsuits against semi-trucks for more than 40 years and there are a few things that we are investigating with this incident.
The first factor is whether fatigue was a factor in the collision. Fatigue is a common factor in truck accidents as truck drivers are pressed to deliver their cargo faster and faster. There are strict regulations on truck driver rest and driver time.
The second is whether or not the logbooks were up to date, and if the driver was operating at the normal hours that are regulated under the Federal Motor Safety Carrier Regulations (FMSCR). This is known as 49 CFR Parts 300-399. These are federal laws that mandate rules and truck driver regulations on semi-trucks to help keep pedestrians and vehicles safe. These regulations include allowed drive time, driving breaks, and more.
The most important part of the FMSCR is part is drug testing. While we have no information at this time to support or claim the driver of the Amerifreight was under the influence of drugs, this is something that must be ruled out, especially with the truck causing the death of the bicyclist.
Drug and alcohol testing are required by part 382 of the FMSCR and are a mandatory part of any truck driver who holds a commercial driver’s license.
We will be providing updates as our firm learns more from our ongoing investigation about this fatal bicycle accident.
Wrong Way Driver Kills 2
The CHP confirmed today, June 12, 2019, that a wrong way driver on US 101 south of San Luis Obispo resulted in a double fatality wreck.
According to various local news sources, a 22-year-old Washington woman was driving her Ford Fiesta southbound in the northbound lane of US 101 just south of the South Higuera on and off ramps. She collided head-on with a 44-year-old Los Osos man driving a Honda Civic. Both drivers were wearing seatbelts, but due to the force of the crash, both drivers were killed.
The images below show the South Higuera interchange. As one can see there are several intersecting roads leading to parking areas for local hiking trails, north and southbound on and off ramps, and a frontage road.
If the wrong way driver entered the northbound lanes heading south at this spot, it is likely that she entered the road as depicted below. A driver intending to make a right turn onto Clover Ridge is faced with two options, the second of which is the frontage road. The first road one would encounter is the northbound off-ramp. There are signs warning of entering the freeway off-ramp as “Wrong Way”, but the signed is placed directly between the off-ramp and the frontage road. Further investigation will be needed to determine exactly what happened.
The United State Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration has undertaken extensive studies of the phenomenon of wrong way drivers. The answers are usually multi-disciplinary, involving traffic design, speeds, human factors and visibility.
A study from the NCBI found that the reasons for wrong way crashes often depend on the time of the crash, age of the driver, day of the week and, of course, impairment and driver distraction.
In a crash of this magnitude, the CHP MAIT team will surely investigate. MAIT is the Multidisciplinary Accident Investigation Team and is an elite group of officers trained to conduct in-depth and detailed investigation of major crashes.
If an investigation shows that the wrong way driver is legally responsible for the Los Osos man’s death his heirs would be entitled to a bring a Wrongful Death claim seeking to recover damages based on the loss of their loved one. This would include lost economic support, but most significantly, the loss of a son, father or husband.
If you have been effected by a car accident, our team is here to help. Contact our San Luis Obispo car accident lawyers today.
Fatal Big-Rig Crash in Orcutt
A tragic wreck was reported this morning. A big-rig is alleged to have run a red light and struck multiple vehicles. The truck rolled over due to the force of the impact.
Two people died in the crash and 6 to 8 others were being evaluated for various injuries.
As of this morning southbound Highway 135 is still closed.
The driver of the big-rig was arrested for driving under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol. In reviewing photos graphs of the wreckage it appears that the truck was a Sysco truck.
Sysco is a large food distribution company.
Sysco Central California is based in Modesto, Ca. and reports having 104 drivers covering 2,818,652 miles per year in 2018.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations are very strict concerning a driver’s behavior.
The limit for the presence of alcohol in the system is lower than a standard passenger vehicle. According to FMRS § 392.5, a driver cannot have more than a 0.04% blood alcohol level in his system while driving a commercial motor vehicle. This is one-half of the limit for the driver of a passenger vehicle.
Drugs are even a bigger problem with big-rig drivers. Of course, there are some drivers who use illicit drugs simply for the high. However, there is a huge problem with big-rig drivers using stimulants to keep them awake on long drives. A driver arrested for alcohol or drug use so early in the morning lends one to believe that this is a stimulant drug case.
Amphetamines and cocaine may help drivers stay awake, but these drugs can cause vertigo, agitation, hallucinations and change perceptions and reactions, which are critical areas for a truck driver.
Whenever a truck driver is involved in a wreck there are several factors that must be immediately evaluated.
First, a driver must be tested immediately after a wreck for alcohol or drugs, even if he is not suspected of being under the influence. Here, clearly, the police have suspicion so the driver has already been tested.
Secondly, it is important to examine the log books of the driver. A big-rig driver must keep very careful records detailing every minute of his day. The driver must note whether he is Driving, Off-Duty, On Duty Not Driving or Sleeper Birth. A driver has a limited number of hours that he can be on duty and an even more limited time that he can drive in a defined period of time. Typically a driver cannot be On Duty for more than 60 hours in 7 days, or 80 hours in 8 days. In any given 24-hour period a driver cannot drive more than 11-hours. After driving 11 hours the driver must be Off-Duty before restarting his driving time.
A driver’s record of duty status, in duplicate, must be kept by each driver and each co-driver while driving, on duty but not driving, or resting in a sleeper berth. The record of duty status must be presented for inspection immedilltely upon request by any authorized CHP employee, any regularly employed and salaried police officer, or deputy sheriff. There may be instances when you do not need to maintain a record of duty status.
COLLISION REPORTING
Every driver involved in a collision which results in death, injury, or property damage over $750 must report the collision on a Report of Traffic Accident Occurring in California (SR 1) to DMY. The report forms are available at www.dmv. ca.gov, or by calling 1-800-777-0133, or at CHP and DMV offices.
You (or your authorized representative) must submit the report within 10 days of the collision whether you caused the collision or not and even if the collision occurred on private property. This form is required in addition to any other report made to or by the police, CHP, or your insurance company if the collision resulted in any damage over $750 and/or an injury or death. If you do not report the collision to DMY, your driving privilege will be suspended.
NoTE:CDLholders may downgrade to a noncom mercial license during any mandatory suspension period to be eligible to obtain a restricted license. All tests and fees will be required to upgrade when eligible.
Failure to keep logbooks, or driving over hours is a separate theory of liability against a truck driver.
The next question that must be answered when evaluating a trucking case is the role of an employer. Some drivers run as “Owner-Operators”, which means they own and maintain their own trucks, while others work for trucking companies. Either way, the trucking company has obligations to ensure the driver is fit to drive. The driver must be properly trained. The drive must pass random drug tests. The company must have a system in place to review and maintain custody of log books for at least 6-months.
Finally, it is important to determine the amount of insurance coverage available. The FMCSR mandate that a big-rig carry at least $1,000,000 in coverage, but many companies carry more. It is also important to determine if the trailer was separately owned and played some role in the wreck. It is even possible under some circumstances to obtain coverage from the shipper.
If you have been injured, or a loved one has been killed in a big-rig crash it is important to get your attorney involved right away. The insurance companies for the trucking company have “rapid response teams”, which consist of lawyers and investigators who respond to crash scene within hours.
At Ernst Law Group our lawyers are highly skilled and experienced in handling trucking cases in Santa Maria, San Luis Obispo, and throughout the state.
We are available for a no cost, no-obligation consultation when you call us at (805) 541-300. Choosing the right lawyer is key. Be sure you feel comfortable with your lawyer and that you are not pressured. Be wary of lawyers who contact you without your consent, often times with glossy presentations about their firm. At Ernst Law Group we believe that a client should evaluate his or her own situation without pressure or questionable direct solicitation.
Further Update to This Story From 2/11/19
The names of the two men killed in this tragic wreck have been identified as Rick Motley, age 60, and Jesse Gluyas, age 24. Both men worked for VTC Enterprises.
The CHP has identified the driver of the big-rig involved in this morning’s fatal crash on Union Valley Parkway in Orcutt. The driver is allegedly 56 year old Gilbert Pena of Santa Maria.
The 8 injured people are reportedly all from the Santa Maria area.
What You Need to Know About Fatal Amusement Park Injuries in California
There are seemingly two camps when it comes to amusement park rides in California: Those who ride them for the thrill, and those who don’t, finding them too risky. No matter which side of the fence you find yourself on when it comes to water slides, spinning rides, roller coasters and other adrenaline-fueled rides, the truth is that they can be dangerous. In the most severe cases, the aftermath requires the assistance of a wrongful death lawyer in San Luis Obispo.
Are Amusement Park Accidents in California Common?
Tens of thousands of people are injured on amusement park rides every year. Injuries range from minor ones that require no medical attention to accidents that prove fatal. About half of all people injured on these rides are children, with those between 10 and 14-years-old sustaining the most injuries of any age group. Children, due to their size, make up three-quarters of victims who have been thrown or have fallen from a ride.
The Most Common Amusement Park Ride Injuries
Almost any injury can be sustained on an amusement park ride that malfunctions, but some are more common than others. These include:
- Back, neck and head injuries
- Traumatic brain injury
- Lacerations
- Torn ligaments
- Broken bones
- Stroke
- Fatal injuries
What Causes Amusement Park Ride Accidents?
According to the federal Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), there are several common causes for amusement park ride accidents. These include mechanical failure, improper operation, passenger misuse and the nature of the ride.
When an accident is caused by mechanical failure or improper operation, the person who designed the ride, the park or the person operating it may be held accountable. When a death is the result of an amusement park accident, a wrongful death lawsuit may be pursued.
How a San Luis Obispo Wrongful Death Attorney Can Help
There are different avenues that may be pursued when someone is injured as the result of an amusement park accident. A person may pursue a personal injury claim if negligence led to the accident. For example, the operator may have failed to provide instructions to riders or the park may have neglected to post signs.
Another person may be able to file a product liability claim. This would happen if the ride malfunctioned during operation. In the case of fatality, the victim’s family could possibly pursue a wrongful death claim.
If you or a loved one have been injured on an amusement park ride and are interested in seeking compensation, reach out to our office. A wrongful death lawyer in San Luis Obispo from Ernst Law Group can assist your family in seeking the compensation you deserve. Call our office today to schedule a free case evaluation and learn more about your rights.
Pedestrian Traffic Fatalities on the Rise
A recent study conducted by the Governor’s Highway Safety Association (GHSA) shows that pedestrian fatalities in traffic accidents are on the rise. According to the GHSA, 6,000 pedestrians were killed in motor vehicle crashes in 2017. Two factors have been examined for their potential impact on these statistics.
Possible Factors of Increased Pedestrian Fatalities
The consistently increasing use of cell phones and legalization of marijuana are considered possible factors for the increased death rate of pedestrians. While cell phone use is obviously not new, every day we become more dependent upon our phone for nearly every aspect of our lives. Calls, texts, emails, social media, photos, maps and directions are among the reasons one might be looking at a phone when walking on the street.
According to the National Safety Council, we are most vulnerable when walking in urban areas, crossing a busy street and negotiating traffic. When we do these things while looking down at a phone, the risk is far greater. Pedestrian-vehicle injuries are the fifth leading cause of death for children ages 5 to 19. Safe Kids.Org offers the following tips for safe walking:
Top Tips For Safe Walking Habits
- Teach kids at an early age to look left, right and left again before crossing the street. Then remind them to continue looking until safely across.
- Teach kids to put phones, headphones and devices down when crossing the street. It is particularly important to reinforce this message with teenagers.
- It’s always best to walk on sidewalks or paths and cross at street corners, using traffic signals and crosswalks. If there are no sidewalks, walk facing traffic as far to the left as possible.
- Children under 10 need to cross the street with an adult. Every child is different, but developmentally, most kids are unable to judge the speed and distance of oncoming cars until age 10.
- Be a good role model. Set a good example by putting your phone, headphones and devices down when walking around cars.
Is Marijuana Legalization A Factor Causing Increased Pedestrian Accidents?
States that legalized marijuana between 2012 and 2016 had a collective 16.4% increase in pedestrian fatalities in the first 6 months of 2017 compared to the prior year. It’s important to not misinterpret these statistics. These numbers don’t tell us who is at fault for these increased collisions, or even that drug use was a factor at all. However, it is more than just an anomaly. Too many people are being killed in pedestrian crashes.
Here in San Luis Obispo, police are reporting an increase in accidents involving pedestrians and bicycles. According to the San Luis Obispo Police Department, San Luis Obispo has seen 237 such collisions in the past three years. According to Capt. Chris Staley, many of these wrecks involved pedestrians not following the law. Regardless of whether the pedestrian is following the law or not, a driver still owes a duty to take reasonable actions to avoid a wreck.
If you or a loved one has been injured in a pedestrian accident in San Luis Obispo, please feel free to call one of the experienced pedestrian accident attorneys at Ernst Law Group for a free no-cost consultation today. We will work tirelessly to ensure that you and your family get the financial compensation you deserve.
Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Statistics
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention recently released comprehensive statistics for both fatal and non-fatal injuries. From 2010 to 2016, one of the leading causes of death across all age groups was unintentional injury, with 949,519 deaths reported. In 2014 alone, over 2,600,000 deaths were reported in the United States. The 4th leading cause of death was accidental injury. These deaths include everything from accidental falls or injuries at home to car wrecks and injuries on public property.
While alarming, these statistics tell only one side of the story. In addition to the horrible personal losses, each of these deaths caused a significant economic loss component as well. According to the CDC, in 2014, each death in California caused a per capita economic loss of $538 per person, for a total economic loss of $20,894,000,000.
How Civil Litigation Can Decrease These Death Totals
Such staggering numbers highlight the magnitude of the death of a loved one, and the importance of using civil litigation as a deterrent. For example, a large verdict against a trucking company can bring about significant changes in the way that company does business. We have seen trucking companies agree to new and improved training for drivers, and even reduce the scheduled runs to avoid fatigued driving.
However, it is less than certain that in your civil case you will be allowed to argue deterrence as a factor in the verdict your lawyers ask the jury to return. Defense lawyers often argue that deterrence is not a relevant factor of damages and that any verdict must be based solely on the injuries and damages in your case.
The Arguments For Deterrence
Fortunately, there are good arguments on our side of this issue. Deterrence is not at all synonymous with punishment. Instead, deterrence is an attempt to prevent careless and harmful conduct from occurring again. After all, conduct rewarded is conduct repeated. There are those in the insurance defense bar who would equate deterrence with punitive damages, but traditional black letter law finds the two concepts fundamentally different from each other.
The defendant should be “deterred” by the jury and awarded a full and fair verdict. The plaintiff must be able to put on proof and argue this purpose to the jury for a full and fair verdict. To say this amount is a cry for punitive damages is tantamount to stealing ten dollars and screaming “foul” when you are forced to pay the full ten, not five, dollars back in restitution.
The Restatement of Torts
The Restatement (Second) of Torts § 282 defines negligence as “conduct which falls below the standard established by law for protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm.” The Restatement (Second) of Torts § 285 says that:
“the standard of conduct of a reasonable man may be (a) established by a legislative enactment or administrative regulation which so provides, or (b) adopted by the court from a legislative enactment or an administrative regulation which does not so provide, or (c) established by judicial decision, or (d) applied to the facts of the case by the trial judge or the jury, if there is no such enactment, regulation, or decision.”
In addition, § 328C highlights the function of the jury in a negligence action to determine whether the defendant has conformed to the standard of conduct required by law, as well as the amount of compensation for legally compensable harm. In the Reporter’s Notes to Section 3, comment D, of the Third Restatement of Torts— Physical and Emotional Harm (2010), the deterrence function of tort law is recognized as one of the “considerations to be balanced” against the foreseeable risk created by the actor’s conduct.
The Benefits of Including The Restatement of Torts in A Personal Injury Case
Not surprisingly, the other “consideration to be balanced” against this foreseeable risk is safety incentive. According to the Fifth Edition of Prosser and Keeton on Torts, “the law of torts is concerned not solely with individually questionable conduct but as well with acts which are unreasonable, or socially harmful, from the point of view of the community as a whole.” When we are able to include a deterrence argument in our cases, the likelihood of an increased verdict is improved. The jurors feel vested in the outcome, and they have a personal stake in the verdict.
At Ernst Law Group, we have decades of experience arguing cases before juries. If you would like to speak with us about our trial record, please feel free to call us at (805) 541-0300.
How to Choose a Wrongful Death Law Firm
It’s always a tragedy when a loved one is killed in an accident. You can never be prepared for such an occurrence. Beyond the love you have lost, you may be forced to worry about costly financial expenses. If someone else is deemed to be responsible for the death of your family member, you may be able to file a lawsuit in civil court seeking compensation for what you have lost.
Any person can file a lawsuit on their own. It is often a better choice to hire legal representation in order to receive the highest amount of damages possible. These are some things to look for when you are seeking a wrongful death attorney.
1. Settlements for Everyone
Beware of the attorney that advertises high settlements for every client. While everyone feels they should be rewarded a large financial compensation for the wrongful death of a loved one, this is simply not always going to happen. Each case is unique and no attorney can promise each of their clients a huge settlement package. An attorney who advertises such a thing may not be lying outright, but they are bending the truth in a significant way.
2. Reputation
Attorneys have reputations within the legal community. Ask around about some of the wrongful death attorneys in your area. If you know an attorney, ask them who they would recommend. If you don’t know an attorney, seek the advice of your local or state law society. You can also check to see if anyone has issued a formal complaint against the attorneys you are considering.
3. Ask for a Consultation
Your relationship with a wrongful death attorney is personal. You should feel comfortable with this person and be willing to be frank with them. Most wrongful death attorneys offer a free initial consultation. Make an appointment with a few different attorneys and see which one suits you the best. There is absolutely nothing wrong with “shopping” around for an attorney.
4. Cost
Don’t be shy about discussing cost during your consultations. You should know what kind of payment plan the attorneys expect. Do they anticipate the payment of a retainer up front? Will they work on a contingency basis? Each individual attorney chooses how much they will charge and how often they will charge. If the attorney does work on a contingency basis, ask how much they will be taking out of your settlement if your case is successful.
5. Attention
You should find out how many cases your attorney will be working on at once. Look at the size of a law firm. If you go with a large firm, you can reasonably expect that some aspects of your case will be handed to junior members of the team. A smaller firm may be able to give your case more personalized attention.
Don’t be afraid to ask questions of any attorney you are considering for your case. If a loved one has been killed as the result of someone’s error or negligence in San Luis Obispo, we are here for you. Reach out to our team today, and schedule your free consultation. We are happy to answer your questions and provide you with your legal options.
Another Fatal Wreck at Cholame “Y”
On April 6, 2018, another fatal wreck occurred at the Highway 41/46 intersection, also known as the Cholome “Y”. This accident is yet another serious wreck that has occurred at this intersection in recent months.
According to reports, the KSBY Highways 41, 46 and 33 are closed in the area and are expected to be closed for several hours. At least 5 vehicles are reportedly involved and 11 total injuries and two deaths have been reported. Further details on the cause of the wreck are not yet available.
The Dangers of Cholame “Y”
This intersection, also known as the Jimmy Dean memorial intersection, has seen far too many fatal and serious injury wrecks. In 2017, at least 6-people died at the “Y”, also dubbed, Blood Alley, in just 2 months. From approximately January 1, 2017 to the end of May 2017, six separate crashes on SR 46 and SR 41 cost at least six human lives and caused additional injuries. On March 17, 2017, a head-on crash on SR 41, north of the “Y”, killed a young woman when she drifted into an oncoming car. The accidents at this extremely dangerous intersection do not stop here.
On March 31, 2017, a five-car collision occurred on SR 46 near the Shandon rest area. This accident happened when a truck collided with a pickup, killing the pickup’s driver. On April 30, a three-car collision occurred on SR 46 near the “Y” that killed an elderly woman. On May 9, 2017, a head-on crash on SR 46 East near Lucy Brown Road killed a 29-year-old man. On May 13, 2017, a two-car collision at the “Y” intersection killed a 64- year-old man.
Why Hasn’t This Dangerous Intersection Been Fixed?
Going back 20 years prior to 2017, serious injury and death have constantly occurred at or near Blood Alley and the “Y” junction due to car accidents. These crashes have happened at a rate well above the state average. Now, decades too late, San Luis Obispo has recently received a commitment of $261,000,000 to fix the dangerous road. The California Transportation Commission approved the funds which will be used for an overpass.
But is this too late? This intersection has been far too dangerous for far too long. Cal Trans is responsible for maintaining safe roads. One must ask, why something hasn’t been done sooner to make this road safer? Certainly, some of these wrecks involved driver error, but these wrecks happen far too often for that to be the only reason. If there is something about this intersection that is making it unsafe for drivers, the State has an obligation to do something. This action should have occurred sooner rather than decades later.
What You Can Do to Fix Cholame “Y”
When a dangerous condition exists, perhaps the best way citizens can force the government to fix it is through civil lawsuits on behalf of those who have been injured, or who have lost a loved one. Suing the State of California over a dangerous condition is authorized in the California Government Code. Specifically, Government Code Section 835 allows a lawsuit for damages when a piece of public property was dangerous at the time of the injury, the dangerous condition contributed to the wreck and the dangerous condition created a reasonably foreseeable risk of the type of harm that occurred.
The Immunity Issue
At first glance, it might seem to be a clear case of dangerous condition against the State. But, a public entity has a very potent defense to such claims— immunity. The Government Code also says that a government entity has immunity for such claims under what is called the “Design Immunity.” Essentially, this defense says that if the road was built pursuant to plans that were approved by a qualified engineer, then the State is immune.
In civil cases involving dangerous roads, the responsible entity nearly always asserts a design immunity defense. Under some circumstances, the immunity can be lost. When the physical conditions of the roadway have changed to such a degree where the original design is no longer safe, and the public entity knows of this change, the immunity can be lost.
Litigation against the State of California is a complicated and expensive process. Road design engineers must be hired. Accident reconstruction experts will be necessary to help a jury understand the crash.
Contact Our Experienced Attorneys Today
Over the years, Ernst Law Group has successfully ligated dozens of dangerous condition cases. We are currently involved in several such cases, and at least one involving this very same intersection. If you have been injured, or have lost a loved one due to wreck at this location, please feel free to call us at (805) 541-0300 for a no obligation consultation.
Second Victim Dies After Severe Car Accident
A tragic car crash in Paso Robles has claimed the lives of two young sisters, Brynn and Brittni Frace. The sisters, who were both attended Atascadero High School, were returning to Chico State University for the spring term via Interstate 5 when they needed to stop for gas.
The girls, who were riding in a 2004 Chevy Tahoe, halted at an intersection prior to pulling out towards Highway 198 in front of a semi truck, which was due west. According to the California Highway Patrol, the semi was traveling approximately 40 mph when the accident occurred, colliding with the left side of the Frace sisters’ Tahoe.
The crashed killed Brittni and left Brynn in critical condition. She was rushed to Fresno’s Community Regional Medical Center, where she was immediately placed on life support. On Thursday, January 18th, Brynn passed away due to the injuries received in the accident.
The young women were both members of the San Luis Obispo County community, known for their talent for running. Brittni was on the cross country team as well as the track and field team, and Brynn had transferred to Chico State to be closer to her sister. They were also members of the Highlands Church.
If you or a loved one has been involved in a truck accident in the San Luis Obispo area, we are here to help. Contact our team of attorneys today for a free consultation to see how we can help you establish a plan, as well as informing you of your legal rights.
Truck Driver Responsible for Death Sentenced to Jail
A truck crash in Nipomo in November 2016 led to one death and three other injuries. Now, the truck driver responsible faces up to a year in San Luis Obispo County Jail. The French woman who lost her life during the crash suffered blunt force trauma to the head after the truck driver’s Isuzu box truck failed to notice stopped cars at a stoplight, and rear ended her vehicle. After the first collision, the truck driver continued forward, striking another vehicle and causing further injuries.
The crash victim’s family filed a wrongful death lawsuit in March of 2017, which was dismissed that summer. The truck driver nonetheless faced charges including a felony of vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence and a misdemeanor charge of reckless driving.
In December, the driver plead no contest to the lesser charges, after the felony charge was dismissed. A plea deal was struck for which the driver was sentenced to one year in jail and three years of probation, in addition to paying restitution. It is likely that the driver will serve around six months in San Luis Obispo County Jail, and will then be allowed to apply for alternative sentencing.
If you or someone you know has been injured in a semi truck accident in the San Luis Obispo area, we are here to help. Contact our team of accident attorneys to schedule a free consultation today. You may be entitled to compensation to aid with medical bills, lost work time, and other costs.